more verbose exit status on FAILED?

[jasong]

Is it possible to receive more verbose failure information than just 'FAILED'?
Some good bits of information would be the exception, control the error appeared with, and the action attempted.

Jason

[Support Team]

I assume that you mean the code generated by the RanorexRecorder. By default the generated code does not include any error checks nor status loggings.

Of course you can easily extend the generated code, check the return value of methods and print log statements if they have failed.

We're currently discussing how to improve logging in future versions.

Regards,

Alex
Ranorex Support Team

[jasong]

A good Pythonic way to deal with this would be to create a set of exceptions that act as your messengers.

Put each action (e.g. mouseclick) inside a try clause and test for the various exceptions that could be generated by that action. This gives an extreme amount of power to the script writer and tester to be able to not just receive better information but how to optionally handle it.

Logging (and I recommend using the Python logging module) is a way to capitalize on all of this.

Keep up the good work!

[Support Team]

Thank you for your feedback! We will consider your suggestions for the next feature prioritization.

Regards,

Alex
Ranorex Support Team

[jasong]

How specifically could I return results that would appear in the Recorder?

For example 'Can not find <control>'

[Support Team]

Just check the return value of the corresponding Ranorex method and print information about the error.

E.g. if the generated script calls the