Hi,
I am using TestTrack testcase management for running testcases. By default TestTrack TCM only supports QA Wizard Pro Script files(*.qawbat and *.qawbatch)
In order to run automated Ranorex scripts out of TestTrack TCM, it is necessary to write a script agent which communicates with the Ranorex *.exe files and TestTrack. See infos here: http://labs.seapine.com/TCMScriptAgent.php
Does Ranorex already suppurt this script agent and can provide it to me? If not is it planned to support a TestTrack plugin for the future?
Or has anybody else already had this issue and can help me?
Thanks in advance
Script Agent for Seapine TestTrack TCM
- Support Team
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12145
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:30 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Script Agent for Seapine TestTrack TCM
Hi,
Regards,
Peter
Ranorex Team
Sorry but currently we don't support this tool and such a feature is not on our road-map. I will add a bug as feature request to our internally bug-tracking system to document this feature.Hermch wrote:Does Ranorex already suppurt this script agent and can provide it to me? If not is it planned to support a TestTrack plugin for the future?
Or has anybody else already had this issue and can help me?
Regards,
Peter
Ranorex Team
Re: Script Agent for Seapine TestTrack TCM
I'd like to second this request.
We use Test Track and Ranorex extensively, it would be beneficial to provided anything removing the ongoing admin overheads when using these two platforms together.
We use Test Track and Ranorex extensively, it would be beneficial to provided anything removing the ongoing admin overheads when using these two platforms together.
- Support Team
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12145
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:30 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Script Agent for Seapine TestTrack TCM
Hi,
Could you send us more information about what we should do/provide in order to remove the overhead?
How do you use Ranorex and Test Track? Could you send us some more information about how you use it?
Thanks,
Markus
Could you send us more information about what we should do/provide in order to remove the overhead?
How do you use Ranorex and Test Track? Could you send us some more information about how you use it?
Thanks,
Markus
Re: Script Agent for Seapine TestTrack TCM
Hi,
Has there been any more investigation into this?
Any workarounds or advice would be appriciated.
Cheers.
Has there been any more investigation into this?
Any workarounds or advice would be appriciated.
Cheers.
- Support Team
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12145
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:30 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Script Agent for Seapine TestTrack TCM
Hello SystemC,
There is no TestTrack plugin in Ranorex at the moment.
In order to discuss feature request i would prefer to continue the communication via email.
Can you please send an email to [email protected] in order to discuss the feature in more detail.
Regards,
Bernhard
There is no TestTrack plugin in Ranorex at the moment.
In order to discuss feature request i would prefer to continue the communication via email.
Can you please send an email to [email protected] in order to discuss the feature in more detail.
Regards,
Bernhard
Re: Script Agent for Seapine TestTrack TCM
Did anything come of this?
We are looking to integrate the 2 and are wondering how to resolve calling the automation scripts within the TCM software.
We are looking to integrate the 2 and are wondering how to resolve calling the automation scripts within the TCM software.
- Support Team
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12145
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:30 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Script Agent for Seapine TestTrack TCM
Hello garyb576,
Currently, we do not have a TestTrack plugin
In order to raise and discuss your feature request may I ask you to send it to [email protected]? We want to handle feature request via email in order to avoid misunderstandings.
Regards,
Robert
Currently, we do not have a TestTrack plugin
In order to raise and discuss your feature request may I ask you to send it to [email protected]? We want to handle feature request via email in order to avoid misunderstandings.
Regards,
Robert