Hi,
So I upgraded to version 3.0.1 and while the controlnet11s are all gone I still can't see as deeply into the win7 version. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Edward
Search found 10 matches
- Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:35 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2364
- Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:05 pm
- Forum: Object Identification and Technologies
- Topic: Strange xPath for text field
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2856
Re: Strange xPath for text field
The weight rule list is reached by clicking the link at the bottom of the "overview" tab in the spy, the link reads "Edit Path Weights...".
I'm just guessing but I think the ClassName is the 'Class' identifier (which is Static for the text).
Edward
I'm just guessing but I think the ClassName is the 'Class' identifier (which is Static for the text).
Edward
- Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:27 pm
- Forum: Object Identification and Technologies
- Topic: Strange xPath for text field
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2856
Re: Strange xPath for text field
Looking at the snapshot, you could use either controlID or Instance to identify the text although you should probably restart the application several times and make sure that whichever you use remains constant. (Try starting it with more programs running or less and see if anything changes). I'm not...
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:10 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2364
Re: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
The AUT is built with .Net 4.0. You guess is correct in terms of the application being on a network drive to ensure that everyone uses the most current version. Is it possible that this could cause problems with the spy on win7 but not on xp?
Edward
Edward
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:15 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2364
Re: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
I was already using the run as administrator option for the spy tool, but the AUT doesn't have that option.
Edward
Edward
- Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:43 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2364
Re: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
From what I can tell (being someone who's never used win7 before) having the UAC set to never notify is equivalent to turning it off. And I made sure beforehand that my account is an admin account.
Edward
Edward
- Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:25 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2364
Re: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
The UAC settings were set to never notify, I've tried at several different settings and none of them change what the spy sees.
Edward
Edward
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 6:45 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2364
Ranorex can't 'see' as deep in win7
Are there reasons why the Spy tool might not be able to see as deeply into an application on win7 as opposed to XP? I've tried using both versions of the spy tool and I get the same results with both. I don't mean the path is different between the two OS, the problem is that on win7 I can't get the ...
- Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:56 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Validate.NotExist timeout help
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2641
Re: Validate.NotExist timeout help
The only way to set that up that I know of is to use a while loop with two conditions. Something like: System.DateTime start_time = System.DateTime.Now; bool result = true; while ( result && System.DateTime.Now.Subtract( start_time ).Seconds < 10 ) { result = repo.folder.TryFindSingle(RxPath, out ra...
- Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:52 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Validate.NotExist timeout help
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2641
Re: Validate.NotExist timeout help
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're trying to check "after ten seconds does this item still exist". The method you're using thinks more like "Does this item exist now and after ten seconds stop checking" If you want the first option I think you have to hard code in a delay or something...