Search found 22 matches

by Geci
Tue Mar 24, 2020 8:38 pm
Forum: General Questions
Topic: Save a report for one module in a separate folder
Replies: 3
Views: 958

Re: Save a report for one module in a separate folder

Hello, many thanks for the help. I solved it with an own logger. Example: public sealed class CustomLogger : IReportLogger, IDisposable { private readonly string _fileName; private readonly string _testName; private XmlWriter _xmlWriter; public CustomLogger(string fileName, string testName) { _fileN...
by Geci
Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:28 am
Forum: General Questions
Topic: Save a report for one module in a separate folder
Replies: 3
Views: 958

Save a report for one module in a separate folder

Hello,

i would like to save a report for a single module in addition to the report for the entire run.
how can you implement this?

Sincerely yours
GeCi
by Geci
Mon Mar 02, 2020 3:00 pm
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Cleanup in Mappings is not working properly
Replies: 2
Views: 1407

Re: Cleanup in Mappings is not working properly

Hello Robin,

sorry for my late reply.
TestExample.zip
.

Sincerely yours
GeCi
by Geci
Wed Feb 19, 2020 12:57 pm
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Cleanup in Mappings is not working properly
Replies: 2
Views: 1407

Cleanup in Mappings is not working properly

Hello, the Cleanup in Mappings is not working properly. It doesn't seem to take generic classes into account. Example internal abstract class Helper<T> where T : RepoGenBaseFolder { protected readonly HelperInformation _helperInformation; protected Helper(HelperInformation helperInformation, T contr...
by Geci
Fri Feb 07, 2020 8:56 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: LineageGlueRule errors in FF (Ranorex 8.1)
Replies: 25
Views: 7160

Re: LineageGlueRule errors in FF (Ranorex 8.1)

Hello,

i updated to Ranorex 9.2.1 and the Snapshot can be found in my last entry.

Now there is no log message in the Log window, but

Code: Select all

repoItemInfo.Exists(time);
still throws an exception. However, this only seems to happen when you debug.
by Geci
Thu Feb 06, 2020 10:23 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: LineageGlueRule errors in FF (Ranorex 8.1)
Replies: 25
Views: 7160

Re: LineageGlueRule errors in FF (Ranorex 8.1)

Hi, unfortunately, at the moment the error occurs, I cannot take a SnapShot because I am checking whether a dialog appears. The control is a Windows MessageBox that is displayed by a WPF application. System: Betriebsystemname Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Version 10.0.18362 Build 18362 Betriebsystemherst...
by Geci
Thu Feb 06, 2020 9:05 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: LineageGlueRule errors in FF (Ranorex 8.1)
Replies: 25
Views: 7160

Re: LineageGlueRule errors in FF (Ranorex 8.1)

Hello, i use Ranorex 9.2 and i have I also have problems with "LineageGlueRule". For me, the following errors always occur during the test run. Following line throws exception: repoItemInfo.Exists(time); Exception {"Fehler beim Vergleichen von zwei Elementen im Array."} System.InvalidOperationExcept...
by Geci
Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:09 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Ranorex takes always the default platform
Replies: 3
Views: 1863

Re: Ranorex takes always the default platform

I send you an example.
by Geci
Sun Aug 07, 2016 10:03 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Ranorex takes always the default platform
Replies: 3
Views: 1863

Ranorex takes always the default platform

Hello, our Ranorex project has references to our project, for example "C:\Users\XXX\Project\UI\UI.csproj". This project has following settings: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Project DefaultTargets="Build" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003" ToolsVersion="4.0"> <Prop...
by Geci
Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:49 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Ranorex.Controls causes Warnings
Replies: 5
Views: 2013

Re: Ranorex.Controls causes Warnings

You are right. It is not necessary to reference this dll. We have the Ranorex project in our solution. If i open the Ranorex project with Ranorex, Ranorex add dlls automatic (for example all Plugin dlls). Therefore i added all Ranorex dlls to the project.

Sincerely
Geci
by Geci
Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:37 pm
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Ranorex.Controls causes Warnings
Replies: 5
Views: 2013

Re: Ranorex.Controls causes Warnings

This is not easy because the problem is on several machines (pc's and buildserver). The problem is also on pc's without ranorex installation.
by Geci
Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:59 pm
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Ranorex.Controls causes Warnings
Replies: 5
Views: 2013

Ranorex.Controls causes Warnings

Hello, with Ranorex 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 we got following Warning: The primary reference "Ranorex.Controls" could not be resolved because it has an indirect dependency on the framework assembly "System.Runtime, Version=2.6.10.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" which could not be resolve...
by Geci
Mon Jun 13, 2016 1:52 pm
Forum: Automation API
Topic: Compile Ranorex 6.0 with C#6.0 and .Net 4.6
Replies: 1
Views: 3324

Compile Ranorex 6.0 with C#6.0 and .Net 4.6

Hello,

is it possible to compile the solution in the new Ranorex 6.0 studio with C#6.0 and .Net 4.6?
We have the Ranorex solution embedded in our solution and we want use C#6.0. and .Net 4.6.

Best regared
GeCi
by Geci
Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:32 pm
Forum: Object Identification and Technologies
Topic: Reusable Mappings are very slowly
Replies: 1
Views: 1598

Re: Reusable Mappings are very slowly

Update: When i use an App Folder with Path "/container" and add a Root Folder with Path "container[@controltype='UI.BasicInformationUserControl']/container[@controlname='_basicInformationGroupBox']" all works fine. The difference is that the App Folder path starts always with "/" and the Root Folder...
by Geci
Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:06 pm
Forum: Object Identification and Technologies
Topic: Reusable Mappings are very slowly
Replies: 1
Views: 1598

Reusable Mappings are very slowly

Hello, in our GUI we have a UserControl "BasicInformationUserControl". This control is used in several other controls, for example in the Form A and B. Until now I have mapped BasicInformationUserControl twice, once in the mapping for A and once in mapping for B. But this is not very nice. That's wh...