Hi I am also going to look into this option, so far we are using physical devices in house. I will update
We are using iPhones, not Android
Search found 65 matches
- Thu Apr 04, 2019 6:15 am
- Forum: Mobile Testing
- Topic: Can Ranorex mobile tests be run against popular Mobile Device Farms?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9475
- Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:44 pm
- Forum: Mobile Testing
- Topic: Getting iPhone timezone from code
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1456
Getting iPhone timezone from code
Hi I could not find the Ranorex API for getting the iPhone device Time zone from the Ranorex code.
Has anyone done this before?
Has anyone done this before?
- Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:15 am
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: Jenkins Pipeline Teststatus Return
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1798
Re: Jenkins Pipeline Teststatus Return
Hi semate you need to parse the report using step([$class: 'XUnitPublisher', thresholds: [[$class: 'FailedThreshold', failureNewThreshold: '', failureThreshold: '0', unstableNewThreshold: '', unstableThreshold: '']],tools: [[$class: 'NUnitJunitHudsonTestType', pattern: 'xxxxxreportxxxxx.xml', skipNo...
- Tue Aug 21, 2018 1:16 pm
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: BDD Integration with NUnit-console - missing dlls
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2133
Re: BDD Integration with NUnit-console - missing dlls
Thanks Robin, I put the xcopy in post-build event (from Ranorex installation). works well.
- Thu May 03, 2018 9:42 am
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: BDD Integration with NUnit-console - missing dlls
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2133
Re: BDD Integration with NUnit-console - missing dlls
Thanks RobinHood42 , I know about this, but as stated , setting the copy true and compiling creates files (e.g. xml files) that are not in the /runtime directory. So there seems to be a difference between the output of "copy runtime to local" (Settings) option and "Local Copy" true of a reference (R...
- Tue May 01, 2018 10:36 am
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: BDD Integration with NUnit-console - missing dlls
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2133
BDD Integration with NUnit-console - missing dlls
Hi I tried the BDD Integration with NUnit-console, as the runner. This works well in Visual Studio (specflow addin), since I can mark Ranorex.Core as "Local Copy" = True , in the reference property. This will create the necessary Ranorex dll's in the bin/Debug Folder while using the Ranorex Studio (...
- Tue May 01, 2018 9:07 am
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: BDD Integration to Ranorex Studio
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1793
BDD Integration to Ranorex Studio
Hi, the BDd integration with Ranorex Studio, as described in the blog, works well. There are 2 issues: 1. how to see the colors of the scenario text in Ranorex Studio, as seen in the specflow-visual studio integration? (given, when, then in blue etc.). 2. The integration requires copying files to th...
- Thu Sep 14, 2017 7:35 am
- Forum: Mobile Testing
- Topic: Deploy App: iPhone/Apple Watch UDID difference
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1948
Deploy App: iPhone/Apple Watch UDID difference
Issue while deploying an instrumented .ipa to iPhone, which includes a deployment to a Apple Watch Regular deployment of the ipa (not via Ranorex) deploys successfully to the device and Apple Watch wearable. iPhone has its own UDID. Apple Watch also has its own standalone UDID. Ranorex deploys the i...
- Wed Jul 26, 2017 6:22 am
- Forum: Automation Discussions
- Topic: Automated testing for memory leaks
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2491
Re: Automated testing for memory leaks
maybe you can use the C# weakreference to access objects via C# code?
- Mon Jun 19, 2017 9:58 am
- Forum: Mobile Testing
- Topic: Error in Ranorex Instrumentation Wizard
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1743
Re: Error in Ranorex Instrumentation Wizard
Hi, you might also try to enable logging on the Wizard, so that you can see the actual problem (nlog config) and post it
- Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:11 pm
- Forum: Object Identification and Technologies
- Topic: Object Identification stopped working
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2773
Re: Object Identification stopped working
Hi @qwertzu 1. The settings didn't help (I already tried them). From your screenshot, I think that you have chrome 58 (or earlier) and not 59 2. I can't create a snapshot because even the self of the browser root (domain=...) is not found, in order to make the snapshot. I will keep investigating. Th...
- Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:58 am
- Forum: Object Identification and Technologies
- Topic: Object Identification stopped working
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2773
Re: Object Identification stopped working
updating new chrome 59 has stopped the errors in the Chrome logs, but the background.html link in the Ranorex chrome extension has the same issue still.
- Tue May 30, 2017 8:51 am
- Forum: Object Identification and Technologies
- Topic: Object Identification stopped working
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2773
Object Identification stopped working
Hi On a laptop, suddenly object identification on Chrome stopped working (test runs but nothing happens). Tests have been running for a long time before this happened on this machine. This machine only has runner installed. The differences that I noticed on this machine from others are 1. Chrome pro...
- Tue May 30, 2017 6:17 am
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: How to run further steps, based on previous image validation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2062
Re: How to run further steps, based on previous image validation
hi jpinto in the validation recording, add a variable (variables button) and populate it in the step of the validation (populate it wit the result: true or false). example try { Ranorex.Validate(...) [or similar] myRecording.var_result=Boolean.TrueString } catch (exception e) { myRecording.var_resul...
- Mon May 22, 2017 5:22 am
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: How to run further steps, based on previous image validation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2062
Re: How to run further steps, based on previous image validation
Hi jpinto
You can populate a variable of the recording (e.g. true, false), according to the validation, and then use its value in consecutive steps, to asses whether to perform them or not.
You can populate a variable of the recording (e.g. true, false), according to the validation, and then use its value in consecutive steps, to asses whether to perform them or not.