Search found 3 matches
- Fri Aug 15, 2008 12:03 pm
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: Code generation without playing the recorded sequence?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3169
Code generation without playing the recorded sequence?
Why is it necessary to play a recorded sequence before code (C#, Python and C++) is generated? I would prefer to get the code immediately after I stop recording. If required I could also click an extra button like 'Generate Code'.
- Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:46 pm
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: Can I prevent the Recorder from creating unnecessary code?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3023
Can I prevent the Recorder from creating unnecessary code?
I just recorded a sequence of mouse activities. The following code shows one part of the script which clicks on a control. Ranorex.LoggerInfo("User", "Find child by control id '1195'.") control = Ranorex.FormFindChildControlId(form, 1195); if control == 0: return 1 Ranorex.ControlSetFocus(control); ...
- Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:52 pm
- Forum: Automation Tools
- Topic: Why does Recorder use 'FormFind' instead of 'FormFindTitle'?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3382
Why does Recorder use 'FormFind' instead of 'FormFindTitle'?
I am just evaluating RanorexRecorder and tried to record a short sequence of interactions with our product. The generated Python code works fine as long as I do not restart our software. The reason for this behavior is the usage of FormFind which requires className as argument. form = Ranorex.FormFi...