Search found 94 matches
- Fri May 02, 2014 10:59 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Repo Variable Displays As Unbound
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1743
Repo Variable Displays As Unbound
I created a 'Common' library where I can store functions I routinely use. In the image below be advised that only the 'Locate_User' function uses a repo item which has a variable in its path ($user). ScreenHunter_18 May. 02 14.58.jpg I also have a recording 'CreateOffenses' that inherits the functio...
- Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:30 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Variables Unbound On Upgrade
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2155
Re: Variables Unbound On Upgrade
Hopefully this will help shed some light on the problem as this really holding our testing efforts back. The screenshot below was taken using a solution built in Ranorex 4.0.3. Notice the 7 variables 'In Use From Repository'. Using the SAME solution in 4.0.2 these 7 variables were not present in thi...
- Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:19 am
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Variables Unbound On Upgrade
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2155
Re: Variables Unbound On Upgrade
Maybe this will help diagnose the problem? Please look at the 2 screen shots below. Each are using the same exact solution from SVN. The 1st is using Ranorex Version 4.0.2. – Notice there are 10 bound variables. The 2nd is using Ranorex 4.0.6 – Notice there are still 10 bound variables, but also hun...
- Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:23 am
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Variables Unbound On Upgrade
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2155
Variables Unbound On Upgrade
I recently upgraded from Ranorex 4.0.2 to Version 4.1.4. This upgrade resulted in all my variables becoming unbound. This is 5000+ variables I need to bind again. Is there any work around for this issue? Thanks
- Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:05 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: All variables become unbound after upgrade
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2074
All variables become unbound after upgrade
All my variables became unbound after upgrading from 4.0.2 to 4.1.1. We have reproduced this on multiple systems. A situation like this would take weeks to fix. Please fix this issue ASAP. Thanks
- Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:41 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Issues Validating Images Behind Progress Dialog
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2020
Issues Validating Images Behind Progress Dialog
As seen in the screen shot below I am trying to validate an image which resides behind the Ranorex Progress Dialog. In such an instance the object will take up all of its timeout period, Ranorex will hang for 2-3 minutes, and eventually the image validation will pass. When trying to validate numerou...
- Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:51 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: 3.3.3 Image Issue
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2025
Re: 3.3.3 Image Issue
As you can see from the screenshot below our projects are structured where all projects use 1 repository from a class library. In this case 'TacViewLibRepository.rxrep' in the TacViewLib Project. ScreenHunter_80 Nov. 12 10.38.jpg I was able to get image validation to work in other projects by right ...
- Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:38 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: 3.3.3 Image Issue
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2025
Re: 3.3.3 Image Issue
Yes I have multiple projects in my solution.
When I run step 11 by itself (which is just an image based mouse click), it works. However, when run the entire project containing the recording with step 11, then I get the error message.
When I run step 11 by itself (which is just an image based mouse click), it works. However, when run the entire project containing the recording with step 11, then I get the error message.
- Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:36 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: 3.3.3 Image Issue
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2025
3.3.3 Image Issue
I have recently upgraded from 3.3.0 to 3.3.3. Now the only way I can get any image steps to execute correctly is to just play the single step for that image as seen below for step 11: ScreenHunter_79 Nov. 06 14.21.jpg If I try to build and run the entire Test Case I consistently get the following er...
- Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:25 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Optional Action on Image Validation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1975
Re: Optional Action on Image Validation
No. I have it set to 'Failure'.
- Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:04 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Optional Action on Image Validation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1975
Optional Action on Image Validation
My image validation items use to pass until I upgraded to 3.3.3. For each validation item I set the Continue on Fail field to 'True'. Even in prior Ranorex versions, if the validation failed, the log report would display the step as a failure but continue the remaining steps. Now, as in the screensh...
- Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:49 am
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Screenshot Questions...
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2934
Screenshot Questions...
1. Is there a way to enable Ranorex to take a screenshot on every Step in a recording instead of only Validation Steps? I can accomplish this with User Code, but was hoping there was a properties setting available? 2. Regardless of how Ranorex captures a screenshot is there a way to manipulate Ranor...
- Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:23 am
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Ranorex Repository Issue
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1583
Ranorex Repository Issue
Using 3.2 I have my main application 'FormTacViewC2' with its xPath shown below: ScreenHunter_01 Feb. 20 04.54.gif When recording if the object was not referenced under this Form Ranorex would obviously create a new repo item and place it correctly there. If the object did exist Ranorex would correc...
- Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:45 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Test Suite Naming Conventions
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2591
Test Suite Naming Conventions
Under my Main Test Suite if I have something like... Test01 > Begin_Test > End_Test Test02 > Begin_Test > End_Test Ranorex will not allow 2 Tests named the same. This makes sense in most cases but since these tests have different master test suite folders the identical names should be allowed
- Fri Dec 02, 2011 8:02 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Blocked Tests
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2807
Blocked Tests
Recently I have seen in my test report that a small percentage of my tests have been 'blocked'. What exactly is this status and what is the criteria needed for such a test to be reported as 'blocked'. Thanks