Is Ranorex 3.3.1 slower?
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:05 pm
Hi,
We use VM's to do our work, and all my co-workers are complaining that since Ranorex 3.3.1 has been installed, it is much slower. All these VM's are Windows XP with SP3 and have 3 GB of memory allocated. Prior to updating to 3.3.1, one user was using 3.2.x and had no issues (the others were not using Ranorex at the time).
An example of slow is as follows; User has Spy, VS2010 and the AUT running. In the AUT they move over an element and hit CTRL+LWin to instant track. It may take about 10-15 seconds or more to update in Spy. If we switch to Spy to early, it may not track properly. Before the update to 3.3.1, it was very fast.
Is there some sort of setting that was off by default in previous versions that is now on that makes it take longer to find things?
As a comparison, I'm using a VM that is Windows 7 based and I have no problems at all with speed. All VM's have 3 GB of memory. I'm also running VS2012 RC.
Thanks,
Aracknid.
We use VM's to do our work, and all my co-workers are complaining that since Ranorex 3.3.1 has been installed, it is much slower. All these VM's are Windows XP with SP3 and have 3 GB of memory allocated. Prior to updating to 3.3.1, one user was using 3.2.x and had no issues (the others were not using Ranorex at the time).
An example of slow is as follows; User has Spy, VS2010 and the AUT running. In the AUT they move over an element and hit CTRL+LWin to instant track. It may take about 10-15 seconds or more to update in Spy. If we switch to Spy to early, it may not track properly. Before the update to 3.3.1, it was very fast.
Is there some sort of setting that was off by default in previous versions that is now on that makes it take longer to find things?
As a comparison, I'm using a VM that is Windows 7 based and I have no problems at all with speed. All VM's have 3 GB of memory. I'm also running VS2012 RC.
Thanks,
Aracknid.