Ranorex Logo

Meaningful Metrics for DevOps: An Infographic

|
Devops metrics

“If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it,” is a truism in business. The corollary principle is that you get what you measure. People are human: when time is short and pressure is on, they’ll focus on delivering the metrics that business values.

DevOps leaders know how important it is to avoid relying on a single metric like deployment frequency, which could lead to a team that values speed over quality.

Here are four key metrics that can help guide and improve the practice of lean and DevOps development teams:

  • Release count
  • Lead time
  • Change failure rate
  • Mean time to recover

Let’s take a look at what the recent State of DevOps report has to say about how high-performing teams measure up on these metrics:

Infographic-Accelerate-scaled

Release Count: High-performing teams frequently release small sofware changes. The DevOps report found that high-performing teams released in small batches and focused on trends, leading to releasing 46 times more frequently than struggling teams.

Lead time: Time from when the issue identified and defined, to when work begins. On high-performing teams with smaller backlogs of work, this time from work defined to begin averages 440 times faster than struggling teams that have trouble breaking things down (i.e., a team with a twelve-month design roadblock versus one that tackles a two-week sprint).

Change failure rate: A failed change is one that requires immediate rollback. High-performing teams build resilient systems with micro-changes that are unlikely to destabilize the whole. Teams in the struggling group either focus on “no failures” (and release incredibly slowly) or are unable to roll back easily, leading to outages. A struggling group averages 5 times more failed changes as a percentage of releases.

Mean time to recover: With easy rollbacks and strong monitoring, a production problem might take minutes to find and moments to resolve. High-performing teams see issues as a change to learn, and they average a time to resolve that is 170 times faster than the struggling peer group.

All-in-one Test Automation

Cross-Technology | Cross-Device | Cross-Platform

In This Article

Sign up for our newsletter

Share this article

Related Articles

Selenium-Performance-Testing-What-It-Can-Do,-What-It-Can't-and-Where-to-Draw-the-Line-blog-image

Selenium Performance Testing: What It Can Do, What It Can’t, and Where to Draw the Line

May 28, 2026
Key takeaways: Selenium gets pulled into performance testing more often than it should. The setup seems logical: you already have browser automation scripts that simulate real user workflows, so why not measure how long those workflows take? The problem is that Selenium was built...
Automated-Regression-Testing-Tools-Which-One-Actually-Works-for-Your-Team-new-blog-image

Automated Regression Testing Tools: Which One Actually Works for Your Team?

May 7, 2026
TLDR: The best automated regression testing tool depends on your application stack and team workflow. For desktop, web, and mobile testing in one platform, Ranorex, TestComplete, and Katalon are the strongest options. For modern web apps and code-first teams, Playwright, Cypress,...
Test-Case-Design-How-to-Build-Better-Automated-Tests-blog-image

Test Case Design: How to Build Better Automated Tests

May 5, 2026
Your quality assurance is only as good as your test case design: your testing efficiency, test coverage, and product quality are all directly impacted by it. In this guide, we’ll explore practical test case design techniques, review common preconditions, and learn how to build mo...