Ranorex Logo

Meaningful Metrics for DevOps: An Infographic

|
Devops metrics

“If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it,” is a truism in business. The corollary principle is that you get what you measure. People are human: when time is short and pressure is on, they’ll focus on delivering the metrics that business values.

DevOps leaders know how important it is to avoid relying on a single metric like deployment frequency, which could lead to a team that values speed over quality.

Here are four key metrics that can help guide and improve the practice of lean and DevOps development teams:

  • Release count
  • Lead time
  • Change failure rate
  • Mean time to recover

Let’s take a look at what the recent State of DevOps report has to say about how high-performing teams measure up on these metrics:

Infographic-Accelerate-scaled

Release Count: High-performing teams frequently release small sofware changes. The DevOps report found that high-performing teams released in small batches and focused on trends, leading to releasing 46 times more frequently than struggling teams.

Lead time: Time from when the issue identified and defined, to when work begins. On high-performing teams with smaller backlogs of work, this time from work defined to begin averages 440 times faster than struggling teams that have trouble breaking things down (i.e., a team with a twelve-month design roadblock versus one that tackles a two-week sprint).

Change failure rate: A failed change is one that requires immediate rollback. High-performing teams build resilient systems with micro-changes that are unlikely to destabilize the whole. Teams in the struggling group either focus on “no failures” (and release incredibly slowly) or are unable to roll back easily, leading to outages. A struggling group averages 5 times more failed changes as a percentage of releases.

Mean time to recover: With easy rollbacks and strong monitoring, a production problem might take minutes to find and moments to resolve. High-performing teams see issues as a change to learn, and they average a time to resolve that is 170 times faster than the struggling peer group.

All-in-one Test Automation

Cross-Technology | Cross-Device | Cross-Platform

In This Article

Sign up for our newsletter

Share this article

Related Articles

How-Mature-QA-Teams-Close-the-Test-Automation-Gap-blog-image

How Mature QA Teams Close the Test Automation Gap

September 11, 2026
Closing the gap takes more than adding more tests Most QA teams want more automation. The harder question is how to scale it without creating more instability, maintenance, and disconnected work. That is where mature QA teams operate differently. They do not treat test automation...
Why-QA-Teams-Struggle-to-Automate-More-of-Their-Testing-blog-image

Why QA Teams Struggle to Automate More of Their Testing

September 10, 2026
The next stage of the test automation gap Most QA teams do not struggle with test automation because they lack motivation. They struggle because the hardest parts of automation are rarely solved by adding more scripts, frameworks, or tools. According to the 2026 Sembi Software Qu...
Cross-Browser-Testing-in-Selenium-Practical-Guide-blog-image

Cross-Browser Testing in Selenium: Practical Guide

September 10, 2026
Cross-browser testing in Selenium is the practice of running the same automated WebDriver tests across multiple browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Safari, to verify that a web application behaves consistently in each environment. Chrome and Edge are based on Chromium an...